From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 01:29:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 655A816A4CE for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 01:29:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AD143D31 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 01:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.0.200] ([192.168.0.200]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i851U0uq092571; Sat, 4 Sep 2004 19:30:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <413A6B6A.4040505@samsco.org> Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 19:27:06 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040831 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bob Ababurko References: <5.2.1.1.0.20040904212126.01b38990@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20040904212126.01b38990@mail.dc2.adelphia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ultra 2....no? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 01:29:59 -0000 Bob Ababurko wrote: > Hello all- > > I am not sure if I am reading it correct, but if I have an Ultra 2 and > wish to use FreeBSD, I am pretty much SOL, unless I want to netboot? I > am thinking of netbooting as what a diskless client would do. If this > is indeed correct, that is unfortunate, because I am going to have to go > with OpenBSD, as I am tired of Solaris where everything is twice as > difficult as it needs to be. Any insight inot this would be greatly > appreciated. > > thanks, > Bob > Ultra 2 and Ultra 1e support was added a few months ago and exists in the 5.3-BETA releases. Scott