Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 02:47:14 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 199897] bsd.gcc.mk: GCC runtime should be optional Message-ID: <bug-199897-543-2KTNBaUXje@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-199897-543@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-199897-543@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199897 Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|Affects Only Me |Affects Some People CC| |gerald@FreeBSD.org Assignee|gerald@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Status|New |Open --- Comment #1 from Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@FreeBSD.org> --- I agree with most of this. (Using one's toolchain C++ run-time library with binaries built by the other is probably tougher and more fragile than the benefit.) This is a clear case where having the ability to easily break one port into several binary packages (as RPM has been doing for quite a while) would be great. Once we have this, certainly worth a try. Before that, and for the time being, I won't be able to make this a priority. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199897-543-2KTNBaUXje>