From owner-freebsd-questions Fri May 18 8:31:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from be-well.ilk.org (lowellg.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.184.128]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3AA37B422 for ; Fri, 18 May 2001 08:31:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lowell@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (from lowell@localhost) by be-well.ilk.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id f4IFVVo28371; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:31:31 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lowell) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anti-smurf setup References: <122901c0df96$0ca2faf0$0300a8c0@oracle> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 18 May 2001 11:31:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: dougy@brizzie.org's message of "18 May 2001 14:29:28 +0200" Message-ID: <44g0e2ish9.fsf@lowellg.ne.mediaone.net> Lines: 9 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG dougy@brizzie.org (Doug Young) writes: > fair enough .... doesn't appear its got any side affects & at least > might help > nobble the mindless ones to some extent though. Any idea why its not > in > the defailt rc.conf ?? It is. In fact, it always has been, ever since the variable was created. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message