From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 07:06:04 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360B037B401 for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:06:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81F6A4402B for ; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com) Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4]) by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.8/8.12.1) with ESMTP id h5SE62Xh024929; Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:06:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 10:06:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com To: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <20030628063503.GA37411@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KSE: fuword/suword bugs on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: deischen@freebsd.org List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2003 14:06:04 -0000 On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Ok, > > I've started runtime testing and ran into ILP32/LP64 bugs. Attached > a patch that solve the first problems without affecting i386. The > patch is intended to illustrate the problem more than it suggest a > solution. I'm more than happy to test alternative solutions. > Note that the use of uint32_t instead of unsigned int is mostly > to mirror the use of fuword32/suword32... I don't have any problem with the patch. Is there another solution you'd rather see, perhaps using 64bit values? -- Dan Eischen