From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 4 14:38:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468B216A538; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E5943D5D; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 14:38:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id k74EcUEc054325; Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:38:30 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Fri, 4 Aug 2006 18:38:30 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Josef Karthauser , Pawel Jakub Dawidek In-Reply-To: <20060803110525.GE804@genius.tao.org.uk> Message-ID: <20060804183146.N15526@woozle.rinet.ru> References: <20060628103238.GA815@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060628103949.GJ2005@catpipe.net> <3aaaa3a0606281940k63c77ebfga84a854b2cd4ed84@mail.gmail.com> <20060801084156.GD3440@genius.tao.org.uk> <20060801084053.GE22731@catpipe.net> <20060803110525.GE804@genius.tao.org.uk> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:38:30 +0400 (MSD) Cc: Chris , freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can I pursuade someone to commit this patch? (Re: Multiple IP addresses in a jail.) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2006 14:38:38 -0000 On Thu, 3 Aug 2006, Josef Karthauser wrote: JK> > > Dear current folk, I'm forwarding this thread from the -net list where I JK> > > asked the question, is it possible to have more than one IP address in a JK> > > jail? The answer is yes, with Pawel's patch. The question here is can JK> > > I pursuade anyone to commit this to head and MFC it please? The JK> > > motivation is simple. I need to run a second SSL web server inside of a JK> > > jail, however that needs another IP address because SSL is incompatible JK> > > with HTTP/1.1. JK> > JK> > We have been using these patches all the way back since 5-CURRENT and JK> > they work very stable for us. I seem to remember that there were JK> > some reservations about the way it was being done, but for that matter JK> > it wouldn't be the first hack in jail (like u_int32_t for the ip_number JK> > in struct jail :) JK> I no longer have a commit bit, so I can't commit these myself.... :/. I suppose pinging pjd@ did not work? ;) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------