From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jul 10 02:22:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0AAD3E61 for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C02ABDCB for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com) Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net [173.48.121.235]) by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 773413F730; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 22:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <559F2C78.6090102@sneakertech.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:22:48 -0400 From: Quartz User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon CC: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: Questions about freebsd-update References: <559C6B73.8050509@sneakertech.com> <559EA8B8.8080701@sneakertech.com> <559ED47E.8050905@hiwaay.net> <559F25F8.1030508@sneakertech.com> <559F2853.5000103@sneakertech.com> <20150710040949.42c73f4d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20150710040949.42c73f4d.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:22:51 -0000 >> I should clarify: I know it's possible to do this by downloading the >> patch/asc files and doing the whole make/install dance, but that >> requires all the build tools to be installed which is awkward on >> dedicated systems that need a small footprint. > > The tools involved here are already part of the base system (except > they got manually removed, which renders the OS somehow incomplete). > A system installation typically uses compiler, assembler, linker, > installer, and make, which are all contained in the base distribution > of the OS. Wait.... isn't all the build stuff part of the 'src' option during install? If you unselect that, how does make/install apply patches if the files it's patching aren't there? >However, resource limitations might be a problem - even > though nobody admits this possibility today anymore. ;-) Not having to install that ~1G of stuff would help a lot on some systems, especially those booting off a small flash memory device.