From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 31 22:50:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C42516A51A for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:50:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au [210.50.30.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD9D243D39 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2004 22:50:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tim@robbins.dropbear.id.au) Received: from robbins.dropbear.id.au (210.50.221.128) by smtp01.syd.iprimus.net.au (7.0.024) id 400C4DF4004EF4D7; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:51:26 +1100 Received: by robbins.dropbear.id.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6E37141A4; Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:50:04 +1100 (EST) Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2004 17:50:04 +1100 From: Tim Robbins To: Harald Schmalzbauer Message-ID: <20040201065004.GA31325@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> References: <20040128075639.32890e82.xcas@cox.net> <20040131152608.GA28862@cat.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20040131092534.0ba836b2.xcas@cox.net> <200402010345.15476@harrymail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402010345.15476@harrymail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: "Greg J." Subject: Re: mounting msdos partitions buggy? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2004 06:50:18 -0000 On Sun, Feb 01, 2004 at 03:45:15AM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: Content-Description: signed data > On Saturday 31 January 2004 17:25, Greg J. wrote: > > On Sun, 1 Feb 2004 02:26:08 +1100 > > > > Tim Robbins wrote: > > > Try this patch. I'm pretty sure that the problem is that an int * is > > > bogusly cast to a size_t * in a few places in msdosfs_conv.c, > > > but I don't have an amd64 system myself, so I haven't been able to > > > test it. > > > > That did the trick.. thanks. > > How are things usually going? Will this patch be commited to current? > Or are more testers needed (haven't followed the thread (my skill-level told > me at some pont to quit) but I also had serious fd problems). > I'm tracking current so I'll be testing it if it gets commited. I'll commit the patch after I've had some more time to check that I haven't introduced any signedness errors etc. Tim