From owner-freebsd-current Sun Sep 26 22:55:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from alcanet.com.au (border.alcanet.com.au [203.62.196.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F2414F7D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 1999 22:55:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au) Received: by border.alcanet.com.au id <40355>; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:52:26 +1000 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 15:55:12 +1000 From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: EGCS, or EGCS? In-reply-to: <19990926233442.3238A1CC2@overcee.netplex.com.au> To: peter@netplex.com.au Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Message-Id: <99Sep27.155226est.40355@border.alcanet.com.au> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Peter Wemm wrote: >Peter Jeremy wrote: >> I appear to have two complete copies of gcc - one in src/contrib/gcc >> and another in src/contrib/egcs/gcc. >src/contrib/gcc is where gcc used to live. Then along came egcs with a >cygnus-style tree that ended up in src/contrib/egcs (v1.1.1 and later >1.1.2). Now, egcs has become gcc 2.95, so it's going back to src/contrib/ >gcc again. That's the way I remembered things. What threw me is that I currently have two _different_ gcc directories, both claiming to be EGCS 1.1.2, and both being updated. > David O'Brien is working on this now but I think he's >suffering from gcc-induced insanity. :-) I guess that's one explanation... Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message