From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 17:28:12 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC6A16A41F; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4371143D48; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:28:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tataz@tataz.chchile.org) Received: from tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (vol75-8-82-233-239-98.fbx.proxad.net [82.233.239.98]) by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320F5C06A; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:28:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tatooine.tataz.chchile.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 617C8405A; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 19:28:43 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050815172843.GL1597@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> References: <42F749C5.3010308@rfc2549.org> <20050808183610.C55885D07@ptavv.es.net> <20050811043541.GS45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050811043815.GT45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050811043815.GT45385@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "atacontrol info" isn't working here X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 17:28:12 -0000 Hi, > Kevin, no news since then. I made a patch for the manpage which is > actually clearly wrong : > > %%% > The channel argument is the number of the ATA channel on > which to operate. > %%% > > The ``channel'' argument is the name of the ata(4) device and not only > its number. I don't want to coerce people into committing my patches, but I really think the patch in my previous mail should be. This is not a big deal. Regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >