From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 18 21:29:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 121E716A404 for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from pop.imp.ch (mx2.imp.ch [157.161.9.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF8813C45B for ; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Received: from godot.imp.ch (godot.imp.ch [157.161.4.8]) by pop.imp.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_imp) with ESMTP id l2ILS3XV096495; Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:28:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mb@imp.ch) Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:28:03 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Blapp To: Dimuthu Parussalla In-Reply-To: <003001c7699a$fc3d14d0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> Message-ID: <20070318222259.O1036@godot.imp.ch> References: <003001c7699a$fc3d14d0$d801a8c0@dimuthu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: 'Rob MacGregor' , clamav-devel@lists.clamav.net, 'Laurent Frigault' , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Clamav-90_2 Lockup with freebsd 6.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 21:29:33 -0000 Hi, > I am not sure why. But my dual xeon with libthr on clamav-90.1 still gives > very high cpu usage. It's the same case here. What happens if you limit kern.smp.maxcpus to 1 ? Does it still use the same amount cpu time ? What happens if you link clamd against libc_r ? -- Martin