From owner-freebsd-current Sun Dec 27 20:32:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA18963 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 20:32:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA18954 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 20:32:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA191028413; Sun, 27 Dec 1998 17:40:13 -0500 Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1998 17:40:13 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Kenneth Wayne Culver Cc: Conrad Sabatier , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So we're stuck with using timidity now? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 27 Dec 1998, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > Like I said before... Just use OSS/FreeBSD... It is better than VoxWare > anyway. And with some talking to Dev at 4-front tech, I'm sure an > agreement could be made. OSS is better. Better at panicing my system. Lets use the homegrown solutions before we start implementing a _known_ buggy module. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message