From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 15 12:26:53 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E8B16A41F; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:26:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: from isis.sigpipe.cz (fw.sigpipe.cz [62.245.70.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B7A43D46; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from neuhauser@sigpipe.cz) Received: by isis.sigpipe.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C051E1F87BEF; Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 14:26:50 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Antonio Carlos Venancio Junior Message-ID: <20050915122650.GC38644@isis.sigpipe.cz> References: <200509141920.j8EJKAos071104@freefall.freebsd.org> <432892A8.20705@php.net> <20050914212901.GI19945@isis.sigpipe.cz> <4328A112.1040007@php.net> <20050914224412.GJ19945@isis.sigpipe.cz> <432964A3.9010207@php.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <432964A3.9010207@php.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, Pav Lucistnik , bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, Thierry Thomas Subject: Re: ports/86098: [PATCH] devel/pear-PEAR/Makefile.common: allow use by foreign packages X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:26:53 -0000 # antonio@php.net / 2005-09-15 09:10:11 -0300: > Roman Neuhauser wrote: > ># antonio@php.net / 2005-09-14 19:15:46 -0300: > >>Roman Neuhauser wrote: > >>># antonio@php.net / 2005-09-14 18:14:16 -0300: > >>>> SimpleTest isn't a PEAR package and I don't think it's a good idea > >>>> have "alien" packages using Makefile.common. > >>> > >>> Why? > >> > >> Because it's not part of the PEAR PHP Framework. > > > > Is there a *technical* reason? > > No. It's a semantical reason. Ok, putting Makefile.common aside for a while, what's everybody's position on these two questions (simple yes/no will do): * should pear-compatible packages that don't come from pear.php.net get installed under ${PEARDIR}? * should pear-compatible packages that don't come from pear.php.net get "PKGNAMEPREFIX=pear-"? > Keep in mind that you will have to chosse between pear-* ports > structure or the PEAR CLI. Then I wonder why we bother with installing package.xml files. -- How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb? You don't know, man. You don't KNOW. Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991