From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 17 00:39:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56B3F16A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:39:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts13.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A3943D41 for ; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) Received: from number6.magda.ca ([67.70.123.62]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.netESMTP <20040617003831.ZLPP21087.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@number6.magda.ca>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:38:31 -0400 Received: from [192.168.1.132] (gandalf.magda.ca [192.168.1.132]) by number6.magda.ca (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5H0cUdt002089; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:38:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dmagda@ee.ryerson.ca) In-Reply-To: <18173.1087430622@dog.pfcs.com> References: <18173.1087430622@dog.pfcs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: David Magda Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 20:38:32 -0400 To: Harlan Stenn X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTPD and SecureLevel X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Magda List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:39:16 -0000 On Jun 16, 2004, at 20:03, Harlan Stenn wrote: >> ntpd(8) doesn't actually change the time by making it 'jump' to the >> correct time; it slows down or speeds up the rate at which the timer >> runs at. > > Sometimes ntpd will step (jump) the time. Yes, I've noticed that as well (it appears in my logs). AFAICT there's a period of time in which NTPd needs to 'stabilize' and then it slews the time after that point. It's been a while since I've looked into the NTP algorithm in detail though. You may want to ask about it in the Usenet group comp.protocols.time.ntp for details.