From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 24 22:02:06 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12359106566B; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55EE8FC0A; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so137892iae.13 for ; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:02:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5ozUdwN78NueVtt27VixTHwMmwVjH7aUIdk/b43qCSk=; b=N+o+bntDh1LnqGdtvLPQKJQY+76GhxGjQfxHM5bXN00bXFo6qSKHF8op3T4iwGY319 ISgFxylxtuMUW3unFmBgl8gBau2hQVSQpVVvcEpmLNw8/6q48X7YqBnraF9LfkFItcrQ vz7AHei/HZ9g2yWShK6bmVwXLF9lgEwioiqV0= Received: by 10.42.145.131 with SMTP id f3mr15958434icv.8.1327442525277; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:02:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.231.70.15 with HTTP; Tue, 24 Jan 2012 14:01:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> References: <20120124081905.5f497763@cox.net> <4F1F153A.50004@FreeBSD.org> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:01:33 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: C0NmhFfb6PO6r7H1dP2blGGb5Jc Message-ID: To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Conrad J. Sabatier" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "portmaster -o" behaves a little strangely (IMHO) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:02:06 -0000 On 24 January 2012 20:31, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/24/2012 06:19, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Gathering dependency list for lang/gcc46 from ports >> =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update gcc-4.4.7.20111108 to >> gcc-4.4.7.20120117 >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 lang/gcc46 >> gcc-4.4.7.20111108 >> >> (What is the preceding line -- with the ">>" -- and the similar one >> below, supposed to be indicating exactly? =A0If it means what I think it >> does, then it seems as if portmaster is misinterpreting the intention >> of the "-o" option) > > No, it means that the ports framework is seeing 4.4 as a dependency of > 4.6 for some reason. I've seen that happen in the past when non-base gcc > was in use, but have never had anyone track down the cause > authoritatively. Obviously make.conf is a suspect, but I'm assuming you > already looked there. Often happens when people stick USE_something into make.conf :) (don't do that) Chris