Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 20 Jan 2016 07:00:08 +0000
From:      Tom Vijlbrief <tvijlbrief@gmail.com>
To:        Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: make buildworld failed with error "relocation truncated to fit: R_ARM_JUMP24 against symbol `_fini'"
Message-ID:  <CAOQrpVf3VdoZ79V27Abue4GsCBgD-2KzmmotS6SB5%2BfO0d70Sw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <36E4B4DD-C479-484D-8BA3-A1DC1F71564A@dsl-only.net>
References:  <3E1CC674-D534-4C33-8C96-CA9E584931C0@dsl-only.net> <569D2557.3060802@codeghar.com> <C9C41590-3798-45D2-8F47-2A5AB4AA137A@dsl-only.net> <374A0F64-E3FC-42F1-AC03-DF8F88269AEB@dsl-only.net> <569D2D63.8030301@codeghar.com> <FF2B458C-5776-4797-9056-4CAA8DFECC43@dsl-only.net> <CAOQrpVeWUHNUoXAF_ko9NwXQcCkfuZNNbpFAJHTGnY_p5uu5sg@mail.gmail.com> <1453217670.46848.83.camel@freebsd.org> <D058186F-3232-4215-96B9-E1A253F12CBE@dsl-only.net> <1453234839.46848.88.camel@freebsd.org> <36E4B4DD-C479-484D-8BA3-A1DC1F71564A@dsl-only.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Op di 19 jan. 2016 22:08 schreef Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net>:

> On 2016-Jan-19, at 12:20 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:46 -0800, Mark Millard wrote:
> >> On 2016-Jan-19, at 7:34 AM, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 2016-01-19 at 11:58 +0000, Tom Vijlbrief wrote:
> >>>> Op ma 18 jan. 2016 20:37 schreef Mark Millard <
> >>>> markmi@dsl-only.net>:
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you can tolerate tracking the 3.8.0 project (
> >>>>> base/projects/clang380-import ) until 3.8.0 is moved into 11.0
> >>>>> -CURRENT you
> >>>>> could find out that way if clang 3.8.0 behaves the same in your
> >>>>> context. So
> >>>>> far I've not come up with anything else
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> I am having exactly the same buildworld problem on my RPI which
> >>>> used
> >>>> to
> >>>> build fine a week ago.
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently testing the clang380-import branch as suggested to see
> >>>> if
> >>>> the
> >>>> problem persists.
> >>>
> >>> The most confusing thing about this whole thread (besides the lack
> >>> of
> >>> logs so we're just guessing what's going on) is why this problem is
> >>> suddenly happening on clang 3.7.x (I guess it's 3.7.x here) when
> >>> that
> >>> has never been a problem before?  We needed to add the long-call
> >>> option
> >>> when testing clang 3.8, but why do we suddenly need it on clang 3.7
> >>> that hasn't needed it for months?
> >>>
> >>> This very much has the feel of slapping a bandaid on something that
> >>> needs a better diagnosis (there may be internal bleeding).  If we
> >>> don't
> >>> understand why it's failing, it doesn't make sense to try to fix it
> >>> with the "cure" for a different problem.  (Maybe we never
> >>> understood
> >>> the clang 3.8 problem.)
> >>>
> >>> -- Ian
> >>
> >> The -mlong-calls were added to 11.0-CURRENT recently.
> >>
> >> -r293648: 2016-Jan-10 (head/lib/csu/arm/Makefile)
> >> -r294031: 2016-Jan-14 (the rest added here)
> >>
> >> May be a problem/incompleteness in the handling -mlong-calls itself?
> >> Are the above the right time frame for the problem starting for
> >> 3.7.1?
> >
> > We've been using clang 3.7 since October.  We never needed -mlong-calls
> > until recently.  I had thought it was clang 3.8 that triggered the need
> > for -mlong-calls, but now we apparently have a report of clang 3.7.x
> > needing it.
> >
> > So... why?  What changed, and why are we blindly reacting without
> > understanding?
> >
> > -- Ian
>
> The initial report turned out to be for a build for /usr/src content from
> *after* the -mlong-calls had been added to 11.0-CURRENT.
>
> I'm not sure that anything reported as a failure is from before the
> -mlong-calls were added to 11.0-CURRENT. Or from between -r293648 and
> -r294031 .
>
> As far as I can tell people are just exploring trying to find some context
> difference that controls getting the different results. Having an
> explanation established before such an identification is also known is
> problematical.
>

The buildworld on the RPI failed:

http://www.v7f.eu/public/freebsd/world371.log

The same tree build ok when cross compiling. I can supply the log if needed.

My previous succesfull build on the RPI was jan 14, just before the
introduction of the long-call flag for clang but after the long-call change
for crt1.o on jan 10th.

Could this partial introduction of the long-call flag in the installed
world be the cause of the issue? I would expect a buildworld to use only
libs from /usr/obj but the failing link refers to /usr/lib.

I will try installing the new cross compiled world to see if that fixes the
native build.

>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOQrpVf3VdoZ79V27Abue4GsCBgD-2KzmmotS6SB5%2BfO0d70Sw>