From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 13 02:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 227ED16A420 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C728B43D45 for ; Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:50:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k1D2o7H9025428; Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:50:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <43EFF3E2.90001@samsco.org> Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:50:10 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051230 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: babkin@users.sourceforge.net References: <43EFD5A0.83BB82C4@verizon.net> In-Reply-To: <43EFD5A0.83BB82C4@verizon.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NTFS write support X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 02:50:23 -0000 Sergey Babkin wrote: > Hi, > > I've finally got Win XP as the second OS on my mahcine. The next > thing I've found is that NTFS support still seems to be read-only, > and it does not look like anybody is actively working on it. > So adding the NTFS write support looks like an interesting > project to undertake. > > Just in case, if anybody working on it already, please let me know. > Any kinds of ready pointers to the good docs would be welcome. > Or to the existing implementations too (Linux?). > > -SB I'm pretty sure that Microsoft makes the technical details available for NTFS, either from their website or from one of their DDKs. The hardest part is probably in dealing with their journal. Scott