From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 8 19:30:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 25BF51065673; Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2010 19:30:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Rene Ladan Message-ID: <20100808193035.GB26232@FreeBSD.org> References: <201008081759.o78Hxath039177@repoman.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201008081759.o78Hxath039177@repoman.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile patch-rltiles__Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 19:30:35 -0000 On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 05:59:36PM +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > rene 2010-08-08 17:59:36 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > games/stonesoup Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > games/stonesoup/files patch-AppHdr.h patch-makefile > Added files: > games/stonesoup/files patch-rltiles__Makefile > Log: > - Update to 0.7.1 > - Split off SDL version into games/stonesoup-sdl slave port > - Note the new WWW site in pkg-descr What was wrong with having SDL support in OPTIONS? PR does not give sufficient details. We generally try to avoid creating slaves unless fairly strong reason exist. Lots of ports optionally support SDL, imagine the numbers if we factored it all out in to slaves. ./danfe