From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat May 11  8:11:57 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-102.research.att.com [135.207.30.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D97BC37B406; Sat, 11 May 2002 08:11:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 317324CEF0; Sat, 11 May 2002 11:11:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA13169;
	Sat, 11 May 2002 11:11:53 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id IAA24138;
	Sat, 11 May 2002 08:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200205111511.IAA24138@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: obraun@informatik.unibw-muenchen.de
Subject: Re: Some ports fail on -current because ${BINOWN} and ${BINGRP} seems to be not defined
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 08:11:52 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.4/makemail 2.9b
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


This is presumably fallout from the /usr/share/mk rearrangement, but
rev 1.306 of /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk should fix this.

Oh, hey, are the failing ports all ones that use bsd.port.pre.mk and
bsd.port.post.mk?  I guess bsd.port.pre.mk needs the same fix as
bsd.port.mk does.

  Bill

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message