Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2000 11:25:29 +0900 From: Tatsumi Hosokawa <hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp> To: imp@village.org Cc: mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Better solution of "devclass_alloc_unit: ed1 already exists" problem? Message-ID: <86wvpasqg6.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:23:58 -0700" <200001152323.QAA01357@harmony.village.org> References: <861z7jt193.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <867lhbt4rg.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <864scft38i.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <863drzt2xe.wl@ringo.FromTo.Cc> <200001152323.QAA01357@harmony.village.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sorry I read this mail after I sent the last mail about patches without fe0. At Sat, 15 Jan 2000 16:23:58 -0700, Warner Losh <imp@village.org> wrote: > Ufff. That's ugly, but less ugly than some of the alternatives. I > don't think that you need ed1/sio4 in the kernel config file. That > will happen all by itself since the number of devices is no longer > known at compile time. > > A better solution might be to have the system create the device and > return it to pccardd so that it could pass it as an argument to the > insert command, but even that has its problems. I thought a solution like that, but I haven't use it because it's too difficult to do this in a few hours :-). But, in fact, that's because I've replaced all hardwired device names in insert/remove lines with symbolic $device's. I'll try to implement it, and won't commit the last patch. Thank you. -- --------------------------- Tatsumi Hosokawa hosokawa@itc.keio.ac.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86wvpasqg6.wl>