Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 13:34:27 -0500 (EST) From: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net> To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: mbuf wait code (revisited) -- review? Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.991118133218.30813b-100000@devserv.devel.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <199911181830.KAA86634@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Ugh. SIGIO is evil and should never be used. I tried using SIGIO for > tty I/O many years ago and it was a total disaster - it used an > unbelievable amount of cpu due to the signal overhead :-) blocked, queued real-time sigio with siginfo goop slurped sync via sigwaitinfo().. i think we've covered this :) > > I theoretically own the rights to BestWWWD if only I could find the piece > of paper. It shouldn't be an issue any longer with Best/Verio, I'll see > what can be done. I'm interested. -- zach - - - - - - 007 373 5963 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.3.96.991118133218.30813b-100000>