From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 29 02:01:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEB11065672; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:01:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1984F8FC15; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyj12 with SMTP id 12so3827160iyj.13 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:01:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o635z74EcfW7C3G1yczAw7eSV1YK0OO10bnL8qUDdOA=; b=o1/KUwPqpyT4Vvec8GmUsLr5cTGX9z+FRvxZIfu2T9hb37DGNMW3TEIU6Q8AjqoKxp +lQzkMA/DI6Eiuh4LBq3YpkGBWJ4DrI9VpX7dVQqRE+AymbfoLHYB7/znlg5GO4XnO1p 59YUEHiGjkcoWuUlFrfP1y7s0+MiyjHbSpwao= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mtYafn0T8i7PsZVLrs8b1HrpDlkzX0MprIP3INXGcq0+XPK+MtGm2nK736RnkFM5ja /nrznQ7RSc/quK8EvWslWaX6QxO8673py8TrOAkyQsWhDVxTCBWvvTps1oupA5SXfNd4 HF9yHkMr5Ij6e5nEZ9pJszoIQJh9xXErz1wLg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.44.6 with SMTP id ue6mr5312819icb.69.1304041022019; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.165.132 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:37:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110428174523.I61666@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> References: <20110427193946.GA41659@freebsd.org> <20110428174523.I61666@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 21:37:01 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Hartmut Brandt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Roman Divacky , hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make question X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:01:51 -0000 Hi, On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Hartmut Brandt wrote: > I think we can change this, because it would break makefiles that assume > that the entire script is given to the shell in one piece. > I'm not sure to parse that. "We can change it because it would break stuff". That said, if something was to be broken, it would already shows up when using "-j N", and thus should be considered as a bug. - Arnaud