Date: Wed, 3 Sep 1997 16:40:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> To: chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (none) Message-ID: <199709032340.QAA10588@kithrup.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.NEB.3.96.970903152655.9490A-100000.kithrup.freebsd.chat@pooh.cdrom.com> you write: > > http://techweb.cmp.com/internetwk/reviews/reviews.htm > > Comparsion of FreeBSD, SCO's Enterprise Server, Microsoft's Windows NT, >Red Hat's version of Linux, Berkeley Software Design Inc.'s BSD/OS 3.0. An interesting article. FreeBSD does not come out as well as I would have liked, though -- better than NT, but not as good as BSD/OS or Linux. (They don't give any numbers for SCO.) The numbers they do give for Linux are surprising, in fact -- it would seem to indicate that Linux is considerably ahead of FreeBSD 2.2.2 in terms of performance as a Web server, even with several hundred "simultaneous" connections. John? Any comment?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199709032340.QAA10588>