Date: Wed, 5 May 1999 12:12:02 -0400 (EDT) From: "James A. Mutter" <jmutter@netwalk.com> To: James Howard <howardjp@wam.umd.edu> Cc: jgrosch@MooseRiver.com, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>, jmutter@netwalk.com, "Viren R. Shah" <viren@rstcorp.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PCWeek article by Anne Chen -- Comments Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051209560.298-100000@insomnia.local.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95q.990505112149.15848A-100000@poirot.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:I've been using FreeBSD for years and have no objection to running Linux :programs in emulation mode. However, I have seen this by IT people :before. Maybe it would be more advantagous to rephrase it as "Native :Linux Binary" support or something similar just to catch those in IT who :aren't bright enough to understand what that means. : :Jamie That wouldn't be a bad idea. Not a bad idea at all. If it were branded as "Native Linux Binary Support" and a small blurb as to how it works and why it isn't exactly emulation. Could someone with a deeper technical understanding of how this works write something up? Maybe get it into the marketing scheme? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9905051209560.298-100000>