From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 10 04:06:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13AA116A4CE for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 04:06:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BF2CB43D2F for ; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 04:06:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 452 invoked by uid 0); 10 Apr 2004 11:06:03 -0000 Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 10 Apr 2004 11:06:03 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 46E5A2FDA01; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:06:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 12:06:30 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Garance A Drosehn Message-ID: <20040410100630.GA381@isis.wad.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Garance A Drosehn , hackers@FreeBSD.org, peter@FreeBSD.org References: <20040409205016.GA6183@isis.wad.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org cc: peter@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: MFCs needed in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 11:06:06 -0000 # gad@FreeBSD.org / 2004-04-10 01:01:26 -0400: > At 10:50 PM +0200 4/9/04, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > >This is an extended version of my previous email to hackers@ > >which hasn't attracted any attention. This time I'm mailing > >the authors too. > > I must have missed the earlier message... Perhaps because I was only talking about the peter's commit? :) > >Two revisions need MFC in src/sys/sys/cdefs.h: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/sys/cdefs.h.diff?r1=1.78&r2=1.79 > > > >Silences gobs of warnings in just about any libtool-using software. > > > >Fix for CURRENT commited: (5 months, 1 week ago) by peter. > > I have no opinion on this. It looks fine to me. It's unfortunate we're frozen now, but I don't really care if it gets merged now or when the freeze is lifted, someone just MFC it please. I was tinkering with some ports last week, and the sheer number of occurrences of those warnings almost made me roll over. Google didn't prove very useful beyound showing that the internet is full of them (think archived failed build reports, various bento-like systems, etc), all FreeBSD. As for the change you made, I agree it's not worth the trouble. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html