From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Mar 24 08:11:55 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024EFEBE
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:11:55 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from davide.damico@contactlab.com)
Received: from mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it
 (mail2.shared.smtp.contactlab.it [93.94.37.7])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8770B271
 for <freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:11:54 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=contactlab.it; s=clab1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 q=dns/txt; i=@contactlab.it; t=1364112713;
 h=From:Subject:Date:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
 bh=Jof9HN+5txOPqz8ZPN5LILw7KWUuMs5jJW/cKlxHBq4=;
 b=DpT9SH1dRWMPuhsFb/FXZgjr8r6XGqJ1Mg6IrxlF68/Z6RH8DJe4GCaESU55paVy
 vHabf9cRbtY6aJt78V4hYyjI6usls5L08to74Y5/aggDVonOlZ+X5tkrPc59lo04
 H7f5zXb4Z+/zNhDBKBOjWmLfeb3F2Jj9z5arsaTM8CI=;
Received: from [213.92.90.12] ([213.92.90.12:15472] helo=mail3.tomato.it)
 by t.contactlab.it (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>)
 (ecelerity 3.5.1.37854 r(Momo-dev:3.5.1.0)) with ESMTP
 id 80/D8-24145-945BE415; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100
Received: from mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan ([172.16.7.55])
 by mail3.tomato.it with smtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <davide.damico@contactlab.com>) id 1UJg1x-00047S-59
 for freebsd-performance@freebsd.org; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100
Received: (qmail 15834 invoked by uid 89); 24 Mar 2013 08:11:52 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.200.19?) (127.0.0.1)
 by mx3-master.housing.tomato.lan with SMTP; 24 Mar 2013 08:11:52 -0000
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <20130324083802.8289efb593ff186bd358cb87@neosystem.cz>
References: <514C1E5F.8040504@contactlab.com>
 <CAF3xD3nDDUYB94TS9AUUQ=CPztB1S8mU4fRwNB5GupmK8MgwXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <142597a8659b43db8665aa1f055d2ff1@sys.tomatointeractive.it>
 <20130324083802.8289efb593ff186bd358cb87@neosystem.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3
From: Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com>
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 09:11:53 +0100
To: Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz>
Message-ID: <f6c080db-4f32-4d4f-966a-b0af4a8c9b99@email.android.com>
Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Performance/tuning <freebsd-performance.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-performance@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-performance-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 08:11:55 -0000

Ok, I'll try tomorrow and I'll post results here. Some particular parameter to use?

Daniel Bilik <daniel.bilik@neosystem.cz> ha scritto:

>On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
>Davide D'Amico <davide.damico@contactlab.com> wrote:
>
>> I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I have some chance to
>
>> "solve" the issue?
>
>Not sure. But in case you'll get much more similar (CentOS vs. FreeBSD)
>results from "simple" OLTP test, as opposed to very differrent numbers
>for  "complex", it's probable that the cause can be somewhere in
>jemalloc,
>as we've observed in our tests. And at this point, we can rule out
>anything else (ZFS, scheduler, etc.) and knowledgeable people can focus
>on one specific piece of code.
>
>--
>						Daniel Bilik
>						neosystem.cz

--
d.