Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 9 Feb 1997 14:52:05 +0100
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        spork@super-g.com (spork)
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: 22GAMMA-020697--Lib problems galore (fwd)
Message-ID:  <Mutt.19970209145205.j@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970209032429.29150A-100000@super-g.inch.com>; from spork on Feb 9, 1997 03:26:53 -0500
References:  <Pine.BSF.3.95.970209032429.29150A-100000@super-g.inch.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As spork wrote:

> This is a tough one...  I just upgraded from 2.1.6 to today's 2.2GAMMA
> release, and it went really smooth, except for some odd problem with the
> libraries.
> 
> Anything that needs a lib outside of /usr/lib fails, even though ldconfig
> -r shows all of the others (/usr/X11R6, /usr/local/lib, etc...).  In rc, I
> see ldconfig run with all the extra libs, but for some reason none of the
> programs seem to know about it.

Interesting.  I've just checked my 2.2 scratchbox, and even recompiled
to the latest ld.so, and it works fine.  (It's simple to prove, since
the compatxx packages now install into /usr/lib/compat by default.)

$ uname -sr
FreeBSD 2.2-GAMMA
$ ldd /tmp/rc
/tmp/rc:
        -lc.2 => /usr/lib/compat/libc.so.2.2 (0x8027000)
$ /tmp/rc
; exit

(No, LD_LIBRARY_PATH ain't set at all.)

ld.so has had a minor fix between 2.2-BETA and -GAMMA, but this
supposedly only affects libraries that are in the ld.so.hints, but
have been removed since.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970209145205.j>