Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 00:41:35 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 243649] [patch] devel/libepoll-shim: Update to 0.0.20200211 version (fixes various problems) Message-ID: <bug-243649-7141-o0XQB0SnlO@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-243649-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-243649-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243649 --- Comment #24 from Michael Gmelin <grembo@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to commit-hook from comment #22) Just for the records, "with minor changes" refers to not changing upstream and keep using the FreeBSDDesktop fork on github instead. At this moment the fork is basically identical to upstream (besides CI integration). @zeising Not sure if you saw my comments above[0], I think that keeping a fork of something that has native FreeBSD support and is actively maintained by a responsive author creates extra work and complicates contributing. If you want to keep it like that, I'd suggest you close the issue and pull request which were created by the upstream author: https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/epoll-shim/pull/5 https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/epoll-shim/issues/4 Maybe also add some comments in your fork's README.md on github, explaining how people are supposed to contribute if they find problems: - Pull request on your fork on github - Pull request upstream - Bug here - All three of the above(?) Thanks [0]https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D243649#c17 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-243649-7141-o0XQB0SnlO>