From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 25 3:22:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp05.primenet.com (smtp05.primenet.com [206.165.6.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9637B479 for ; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 03:22:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by smtp05.primenet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA04604; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 03:23:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from usr02.primenet.com(206.165.6.202) via SMTP by smtp05.primenet.com, id smtpdAAAHEaa_i; Wed Oct 25 03:22:52 2000 Received: (from tlambert@localhost) by usr02.primenet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id DAA19445; Wed, 25 Oct 2000 03:22:23 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert Message-Id: <200010251022.DAA19445@usr02.primenet.com> Subject: Re: Solaris 8's split cache To: float@firedrake.org (void) Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2000 10:22:23 +0000 (GMT) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20001024193724.A8443@firedrake.org> from "void" at Oct 24, 2000 07:37:24 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > http://sunsolve.Sun.COM/pub-cgi/show.pl?target=content/content8#cyclical > > BSD doesn't do anything like this (distinguishing between instructions > and data in the VM cache), does it? Should it? I keep thinking I'm going insane... Is this true? Have they invented the split VM and buffer cache? Or did they invent a "working set quota for all file system data"? Guess you couldn't patent it, if you called it that... 8-p Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message