From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 19:51:18 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3626316A469 for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from corellia.vindaloo.com (corellia.vindaloo.com [64.51.148.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037A013C44C for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 19:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@vindaloo.com) Received: from [172.24.145.69] (endor.vindaloo.com [172.24.145.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by corellia.vindaloo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED91F5CBC; Sat, 9 Jun 2007 15:51:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <466B04B3.9070803@vindaloo.com> Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 15:51:15 -0400 From: Christopher Hilton User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.12 (Macintosh/20070509) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Php5 port and Apache Module X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 19:51:18 -0000 I can see that if I build the php5 port it defaults to CLI and CGI mode but the Apache module is not built. Am I wrong when I assume that the Apache Module will have the best performance? I guess that I'd just like to understand the engineering decisions behind the default in the port's configuration. -- Chris -- __o "All I was doing was trying to get home from work." _`\<,_ -Rosa Parks ___(*)/_(*)___________________________________________________________ Christopher Sean Hilton pgp key: D0957A2D/f5 30 0a e1 55 76 9b 1f 47 0b 07 e9 75 0e 14