From owner-freebsd-gnome Tue Mar 19 17:12:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D110637B402 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:12:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id RAA01080; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:12:05 -0800 Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29) via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda01078; Tue Mar 19 17:11:50 2002 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g2K1Bjk19707; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:11:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from UNKNOWN(10.1.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com" via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdU19705; Tue Mar 19 17:11:33 2002 Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.6/8.9.1) id g2K1BW488306; Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:11:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200203200111.g2K1BW488306@cwsys.cwsent.com> Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys" via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdm88296; Tue Mar 19 17:11:03 2002 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 Reply-To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group From: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group X-Sender: schubert To: Joe Marcus Clarke Cc: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group , gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Port Naming Question In-Reply-To: Message from Joe Marcus Clarke of "19 Mar 2002 11:29:04 EST." <1016555344.299.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 17:11:03 -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <1016555344.299.9.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>, Joe Marcus Clarke writ es: > On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 11:03, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group > wrote: > > I'm working on PR 35376, multi-gnome-terminal. The port is ready for > > commit, however the port was submitted with a directory name and > > package name of multi-gnome-terminal. Do I commit the port with the > > name of multi-gnome-terminal or should I abbreviate it to mgt? > > Personally, mgt sounds good. Ports get tagged with -gnome if they can > build with or without GNOME, but the user chooses to build with it. > However, the GNOME porting guide doesn't cover a standard naming > convention. This port requires gnome, so it does not get tagged with "-gnome". I've received two responses so far. One for the abbreviation and one against. I will err on the side of the more descriptive name, e.g no abbreviated name. It will install as: multi-gnome-terminal-1.3.13 Gnome tabbed terminal emulator Regards, Phone: (250)387-8437 Cy Schubert Fax: (250)387-5766 Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team Email: Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca Open Systems Group, CITS Ministry of Management Services Province of BC FreeBSD UNIX: cy@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message