From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 20 4:57:27 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from as5200-01-254.no.neosoft.com (as5200-01-254.no.neosoft.com [206.27.167.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A36E15765 for ; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 04:57:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from conrads@as5200-01-254.no.neosoft.com) Received: (from conrads@localhost) by as5200-01-254.no.neosoft.com (8.9.2/8.9.2) id GAA27630; Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:53:32 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 06:53:31 -0500 (CDT) Reply-To: conrads@neosoft.com From: Conrad Sabatier To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: FW: Re: TkWine setup under FreeBSD Cc: Jean-Louis Thirot Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The following is a message I sent to the author of "TkWine", a nice tool for downloading, configuring, building. installing and running Wine, which unfortunately, doesn't work on FreeBSD! I'm really not knowledgeable enough to provide the information he requested in response, so I thought this might be a good place to ask. :-) I've Cc'ed this message to the author, to include him in any discussion that arises. He seems genuinely interested in getting this thing to work under FreeBSD. Thanks, Conrad -----FW: <371C57D6.DDE280A4@univ-brest.fr>----- Date: Tue, 20 Apr 1999 12:32:54 +0200 Sender: jl@sdt.univ-brest.fr From: Jean-Louis Thirot To: Conrad Sabatier Subject: Re: TkWine setup under FreeBSD Conrad Sabatier wrote: > "TkWine was intended to be used on any unix computer. It only makes > calls to basic shell commands and wish." > > So says your web page. Unfortunately, the calls to > grep the /proc filesystem are quite Linux-centric, and fail miserably > under FreeBSD. > > Are they really necessary? > Hi Conrad, Hmm, I'm not really suprised with this pb. I could avoid this error easily, but I prefer to know when it causes pb and fix it. Why do I need this? Because I provide an option for make in parallel on bi(or more) processors. This makes make much faster if it succed (ie the dependencies are written well in Makefiles...). So, better than switching the multi processor detection under FreeBSD, I'd prefer to find a way to make it working. As I don't have FreeBSD, I need your help. What I need is: output of uname -a from freeBSD and how do you know the # of processors under FreeBSD ? uname probably has an option for that. man uname > /tmp/uname.FreeBSD.man and send me the file would be great, or find out how it works and let me know. I really want to make it working on any unix suystem... but I can't test myself... Great if you can help FreeBSD to be added to the list of supported systems..... but be aware that, once this one is fixed, we still can encouter other pb (I know at least 2 places with critical instructions...) Thanks for using it and for your report. Jean-Louis --------------End of forwarded message------------------------- -- Conrad Sabatier To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message