Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:30:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why Clang Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182228220.88997@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <201206182014.q5IKEVdQ014212@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201206182014.q5IKEVdQ014212@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> scratch and this resulted with thing 5 times larger, > > *YOUR* measurement of sizes was faulty. <grin> be more exact. >> old bloated gcc is just funny. > > You _do_ understand that they could not use -any- of the technology > implementations in GCC, that they had to redevelop everything from > scratch, right? even stated this. > I'm sure that you _also_ are aware that a larger program size does *NOT* > necessarily mean 'bloat'. of course. really i can write programs. and really - i don't understand all this fuss about "better error reporting". Really i don't have problems to read gcc error messages when i compile my programs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182228220.88997>