From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 18 20:30:28 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095A2106564A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:28 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7238D8FC19
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5IKUOui094480;
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5IKUNCC094477; Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:30:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com>
In-Reply-To: <201206182014.q5IKEVdQ014212@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182228220.88997@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201206182014.q5IKEVdQ014212@mail.r-bonomi.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Mon, 18 Jun 2012 22:30:24 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:30:28 -0000

>> scratch and this resulted with thing 5 times larger,
>
> *YOUR* measurement of sizes was faulty.  <grin>

be more exact.

>> old bloated gcc is just funny.
>
> You _do_ understand that they could not use -any- of the technology
> implementations in GCC, that they had to redevelop everything from
> scratch, right?

even stated this.

> I'm sure that you _also_ are aware that a larger program size does *NOT*
> necessarily mean 'bloat'.

of course. really i can write programs.

and really - i don't understand all this fuss about "better error 
reporting".

Really i don't have problems to read gcc error messages when i compile my 
programs.