From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Dec 4 22:34:59 1996 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.3/8.7.3) id WAA18085 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:34:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from precipice.shockwave.com (ppp-206-170-5-47.rdcy01.pacbell.net [206.170.5.47]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA18075 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:34:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from shockwave.com (localhost.shockwave.com [127.0.0.1]) by precipice.shockwave.com (8.8.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA02022; Wed, 4 Dec 1996 22:34:32 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199612050634.WAA02022@precipice.shockwave.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr (Ollivier Robert), CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: news/lib - lib/news ??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 04 Dec 1996 22:17:16 PST." <6091.849766636@time.cdrom.com> Date: Wed, 04 Dec 1996 22:34:31 -0800 From: Paul Traina Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Err, I'm just the port maintainer. I don't actually maintain all versions of inn... in case that's not clear (sorry about being ambiguious). Paul From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Subject: Re: news/lib - lib/news ??? > I'm strongly against this change, and as the inn-current maintainer refuse > to make it (and won't let it go in). Then that sounds like a compelling argument to me. The ports collection was never intended as a mechanism for taking over something from the maintainer, merely as an adjunct, and the fundamental goal behind every patches directory is to someday see it go away. :-) Jordan