From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 16 17:33:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FB1010656A3 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) Received: from erengrad.hoster.bg (erengrad.hoster.bg [77.77.142.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B2C8FC26 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from middenheim.hoster.bg (middenheim.hoster.bg [77.77.142.11]) by erengrad.hoster.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9D35DC9FC for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:02:09 +0200 (EET) Received: from straylight.ringlet.net (nat125.cnsys.bg [85.95.80.125]) (Authenticated sender: roam@hoster.bg) by mail.hoster.bg (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABCF5C4F1 for ; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:02:04 +0200 (EET) Received: from roam (uid 1000) (envelope-from roam@ringlet.net) id 416009 by straylight.ringlet.net (DragonFly Mail Agent) Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:02:03 +0200 Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:02:03 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev To: jhell Message-ID: <20101116170202.GH3895@straylight.ringlet.net> Mail-Followup-To: jhell , FreeBSD Ports , doconnor@gsoft.com.au References: <4CDF6DE1.1000006@DataIX.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CDF6DE1.1000006@DataIX.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-MailScanner-ID: 3ABCF5C4F1.27729 X-hoster-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-hoster-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (cached, score=0.001, required 10, autolearn=disabled, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY 0.00) X-hoster-MailScanner-From: roam@ringlet.net X-hoster-MailScanner-To: ports@freebsd.org X-Spam-Status: No Cc: FreeBSD Ports , doconnor@gsoft.com.au Subject: Re: Conflict between netpipes-4.2 and timelimit-1.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 17:33:32 -0000 --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:04:33AM -0500, jhell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > The above two listed ports have a conflict with the installed binary > '/usr/local/bin/timelimit' but do not list each-other as a conflict and > should be adjusted to reflect the conflict with one-another. >=20 > $ pkg_info -qW /usr/local/bin/timelimit > pkg_info: both netpipes-4.2 and timelimit-1.7 claim to have installed > /usr/local/bin/timelimit >=20 > This could also be said for its manual pages as well. >=20 > After removing the timelimit-1.7 package and then upgrading netpipes-4.2 >=20 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Creating a backup package for old version netpipes-4.2 > tar: man/man1/timelimit.1.gz: Cannot stat: No such file or directory > tar: bin/timelimit: Cannot stat: No such file or directory > tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. > pkg_create: make_dist: tar command failed with code 256 > =3D=3D=3D>>> Package creation failed for netpipes-4.2! >=20 >=20 > Though the functionality provided by both timelimit commands are > fundamentally the same, timelimit-1.7 offers quite a bit more control > over the one that ships with netpipes-4.2 without the need to install > files like 'faucet' that may act as a network server. Would it be > possible to install the netpipes version of timelimit binary as > timelimit-4.2 instead ? or maybe another name so these can coexist ? I'm glad that you think that timelimit's functionality is better than that of its netpipes equivalent, but if others don't share that opinion, I could change the port so that the user may specify a program prefix at build time. Still, I'd prefer to leave the default prefix empty :) > *** > As well, timelimit-1.7 would be a great candidate for import into world > since it is your e-std 2 clause BSD license and a 3 file compile. ;) And > if noone else wants to maintain it in tree then ill volunteer. > *** Oh! Of course, I, as the upstream author, would only be flattered if people were to decide that timelimit is fit to enter the FreeBSD base system :) And certainly I would be willing to maintain it myself in that case; still, thanks a lot for the offer, and a helping hand or three could never be too much :) G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@space.bg roam@ringlet.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am the thought you are now thinking. --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJM4rkGAAoJEGUe77AlJ98TO+kP/0LMiDby4ZAtCsdt7P317JiU o5QA6g9ymcuZbTcbP1Oe8WAq9oAGn2A9/t0ew0gmzSPZtzrmDhfOIKzmDv1XfsHV LC/LCvJYGVCRZJ0kPjk8fPNCDJFC5iQReE6kc0jO6bBwJA1Rvz7ii0x1ck9BOQHk G8sl1teWT+Kl4Rd3rsYTCRqyPCUZ5NIkGlsnQoms7c68u5D11Dk8pJCE6hekAEqy FTThu/FhDAdig1a7Rmip6sf/NLjbnTLcTsw7IJbDWaHfIW1mijG2fKZ779gMcKnx /pjNH8PXXE5X7wMDufNT40maAfXm/D9PrpZkC57SHYlGwwWFlqogiBQLcrXPTUR1 b9qoJz4YtIeP8c0nwSVgShIOrK5Bxl7vU3vL14L5ZIIZ6HAb4WWuoTq6jhDMQuy8 bJzI7dlgXgjYw+buj+mLP6EZ+FQ9rzarKvN27Z/+s3mHuMRmtOULtg83RRRZUlzt fuJAPN2msPxm1ydXgKOsgiO7GVSEwAWXCgjB1WhB/Ft8cGY1eT+AoPDmxM/fGTEB UwV/upp8v03rIjzqsxrZ3aE+6V8qV0wxukYHFLKX81G2F3nLsOKqQCq/rvhr9STg glCOM3HJ9UsCbx6M0cmdF0NSWFLYXfdbWereOTOtNo18TvPDcTJK2AySoEhKtoCq I1dcaU+Pb9GjgDyqRG1C =CtUP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UPT3ojh+0CqEDtpF--