From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 09:39:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E1D16A4CE; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:39:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets19-018.kamome.or.jp [218.45.19.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F5F43F85; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:39:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from lyrics.mahoroba.org (IDENT:lwMRe3b4nsRFqmMqqlL18Y0OsSrDYKBBWK7ym2Z2Pfp6bCxdz9rfc5EW8FuouLpt@lyrics.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:280:88ff:fe03:4841]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0)h9VHd00I041192 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 1 Nov 2003 02:39:03 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2003 02:39:00 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Sam Leffler In-Reply-To: <200310310830.19903.sam@errno.com> References: <200310311621.h9VGLQcF082946@repoman.freebsd.org> <200310310830.19903.sam@errno.com> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.11.3 (Wonderwall) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.5 - "Awara-Onsen") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on cheer.mahoroba.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet6 icmp6.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 17:39:36 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 08:30:19 -0800 >>>>> Sam Leffler said: sam> This may be the first of several similar commits to do this throughout IPv6, sam> but I think optimizations like this really belong in the network drivers; or sam> at least at that level. OTOH I'm not sure doing this is worthwhile at all. sam> I'd be interested in real experiences to back this up. FWIW I noticed that sam> some Linux network drivers do this. I dunno exactly, but you can see some comment about this in the code. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/