From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Wed Mar  8 12:57:13 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00E9D02D9F
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed,  8 Mar 2017 12:57:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726361352
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed,  8 Mar 2017 12:57:13 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru)
Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD))
 (envelope-from <slw@zxy.spb.ru>)
 id 1clb9S-000JyK-8b; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:57:10 +0300
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:57:10 +0300
From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
To: Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowling@kev009.com>
Cc: "Eugene M. Zheganin" <emz@norma.perm.ru>,
 freebsd-net <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: about that DFBSD performance test
Message-ID: <20170308125710.GS15630@zxy.spb.ru>
References: <b91a6e40-9956-1ad9-ac59-41a281846147@norma.perm.ru>
 <CAK7dMtDiT-PKyy5LkT1WEg5g-nwqv501F=Ap4dNCdwzwr_1dqA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAK7dMtDiT-PKyy5LkT1WEg5g-nwqv501F=Ap4dNCdwzwr_1dqA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: <locally generated>
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:57:13 -0000

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 05:25:57AM -0700, Kevin Bowling wrote:

> Right off the bat, FreeBSD doesn't really understand NUMA in any sufficient
> capacity.  Unfortunately at companies like the one I work at, we take that
> to mean "OK buy a high bin CPU and only populate one socket" which serves

NUMA applicable only to high-localy computed tasks.
http/https/any_network_related serving is not related to this.
Indeed, on modern CPU is not important to bind NIC irq handlers to
same CPU/sockets as NIC.