From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 4 07:55:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA11579 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Mon, 4 May 1998 07:55:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from out5.ibm.net (out5.ibm.net [165.87.194.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA11557 for ; Mon, 4 May 1998 07:55:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwilde1@ibm.net) Received: from ibm.net (slip-32-100-79-49.ca.us.ibm.net [32.100.79.49]) by out5.ibm.net (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id OAA10354; Mon, 4 May 1998 14:54:28 GMT Message-ID: <354DD2A7.76C69637@ibm.net> Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 07:37:27 -0700 From: Don Wilde Reply-To: dwilde1@ibm.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Matthew N. Dodd" CC: Eivind Eklund , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hey, I've got an idea... let's add _another_ port that's a dummy client that just sits there and GETs pages with banners into the bit-bucket... Content producers win, suits lose. Free enterprise at work! My take on this is that it's their right to advertise to us and our right to filter it. I'm against anybody from government interfering. Little interferences become big ones. I do agree with Eivind's original argument that we shouldn't _advertise_ the port as a blocking / cracking tool, though. The suits and the dark glasses are all lots bigger than we are. --> Don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message