From owner-freebsd-alpha Mon Oct 25 1:54:33 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org Received: from mail.scc.nl (node1374.a2000.nl [62.108.19.116]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230CF150E0 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-alpha@scc.nl) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by mail.scc.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA22612 for alpha@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:38:47 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-alpha@scc.nl) Received: from GATEWAY by dwarf.hq.scc.nl with netnews for alpha@FreeBSD.org (alpha@FreeBSD.org) To: alpha@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 10:38:38 +0200 From: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <3814170E.ADEBBEBF@scc.nl> Organization: SCC vof Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Alpha libs in compat3x Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, With the sigset_t change and the bumping of the version numbers of libc and friends, shouldn't we have Alpha libraries in compat3x? We can do it like: .for lib in ${LIBS} ${lib}: ${lib}.${MACHINE_ARCH}.gz.uu uudecode -p ${.CURDIR}/${lib}.${MACHINE_ARCH}.gz.uu | gunzip > ${lib} .endfor I have a commit ready for compat3x which add the libraries touched by the sigset_t change. I can add Alpha libraries while I'm there and we all agree on it and someone can give me the following -stable/alpha libraries (I only have -current/alpha): libc.so.3 libc_r.so.3 libdialog.so.3 libedit.so.2 libf2c.so.2 libftpio.so.4 libg++.so.4 libhistory.so.3 libreadline.so.3 libss.so.2 libstdc++.so.2 Comments? -- Marcel Moolenaar mailto:marcel@scc.nl SCC Internetworking & Databases http://www.scc.nl/ The FreeBSD project mailto:marcel@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message