From owner-cvs-ports  Tue Aug  8 05:35:45 1995
Return-Path: cvs-ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id FAA26633
          for cvs-ports-outgoing; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 05:35:45 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA26614
          ; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 05:35:39 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA10044; Tue, 8 Aug 1995 05:35:09 -0700
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 1995 05:35:09 -0700
Message-Id: <199508081235.FAA10044@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com
CC: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-ports@freefall.cdrom.com
In-reply-to: <12381.807884594@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/fvwm Makefile
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: cvs-ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * Shouldn't that be done by xmkmf -a?

I dunno.  I just assumed that since the original porter put an
"XMKMF=xmkmf" in there, there is some reason why the fvwm source
didn't like the "-a".

Torsten, what do you think?

Satoshi