Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 22:24:41 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> Cc: freebsd-mips@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r185925 - in head/contrib/binutils: bfd gas/config ld/emulparams Message-ID: <86hc5as8va.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <B6C8C00F-51D8-4FB1-85C8-51AEBB1B8B06@mac.com> (Marcel Moolenaar's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:23:57 -0800") References: <20081211.100636.631212415.imp@bsdimp.com> <20081211.105808.-1186640207.imp@bsdimp.com> <A3EBA690-6598-4007-8E65-24F50FA2ECE3@mac.com> <20081211.130830.1365011002.imp@bsdimp.com> <B6C8C00F-51D8-4FB1-85C8-51AEBB1B8B06@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com> writes: > Why not make OPENPAM_STATIC_MODULES a define that you put > on the compiler command line and change the code to: > > #ifdef OPENPAM_STATIC_MODULES > ... foo ... > #else > ... bar ... > #endif My preference would be to remove support for statically linked modules altogether, but some people might object... This is probably the best compromise. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86hc5as8va.fsf>