Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:30:23 -0800 (PST) From: Kay Lehmann <kay_lehmann@web.de> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52159: updates to pr:ports/52130 and pr:ports/52132unnececary files in shar output Message-ID: <200311140730.hAE7UNS0067964@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/52159; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kay Lehmann <kay_lehmann@web.de> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52159: updates to pr:ports/52130 and pr:ports/52132 unnececary files in shar output Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 08:21:59 +0100 Mark Linimon schrieb: > This PR referenced two other separate PRs. The first > was closed by kris on Sat Nov 1 17:18:55 PST 2003 after > not having gotten a response from the submitter about > the state of build problems with the proposed port. So, > if if the submitter is still interested in adding that > port (sysutils/klineakconfig), it should now be submitted > as an entirely new PR. > > The second is still pending; I have taken the liberty of > copying the comments from here into that one. > > In the future, it would help us ports committers to be > less confused if submitters could keep each "update" PR > particular to one port. In fact, this PR really could have > been done instead as two separate followups to the existing > PRs, rather than as a new PR itself; that would be > preferable in the future. > > All of this is just "for future reference". > Sorry, I am not that experienced in handling pr's, but hope to learn it. I just want to explain, why I did this confusing thing. First I had some problems with copy and paste within my shar-outputs, so I had to correct I think 3 or 4 pr and I thought it would be better not to send to much pr's. Second problem with klineakconfig was, that I responded but I did not CC'd to gnats because I thought I will get an answer from Will. I didn't CC to gnats either because of the same reason like above. I just wanted to lower traffic to gnats. But now I know that both were wrong, but I praise I will try to make it better net time. Thanks for note. It's always good to learn. Greetings, Kay
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200311140730.hAE7UNS0067964>