From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 10 17:14:16 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFD216A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C4C5443D5D
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 10 Jan 2004 17:14:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 15841 invoked by uid 1002); 11 Jan 2004 01:14:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252)
  by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 11 Jan 2004 01:14:11 -0000
Message-ID: <4000A2FC.2040400@freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2004 18:12:28 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net>
References: <40007D14.6090205@freebsd.org>
	<3180.1073776377@critter.freebsd.dk>
	<20040111020459.5bbba56a@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040111020459.5bbba56a@Magellan.Leidinger.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Future of RAIDFrame
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 01:14:16 -0000

Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2004 00:12:57 +0100
> "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
> 
>>As much as I would hate to see RF and Vinum disappar from our
>>source tree, maybe what we need to do is to kick them both into
>>"training-camp" in p4 while you and Greg look the other way.
> 
> [...]
> 
>>I'd say lets kick them both into perforce and let whoever wants
>>their hands have a go at them.
> 
> 
> RF isn't working today on -current, vinum is (please don't tell me
> something else, I don't want the system under my desk stop running on a
> vinum volume just because you say it has to :-)). Do you really want to
> throw your axe at vinum while it's still alive?
> 
> Bye,
> Alexander.
> 

Ok, stop right here.  This is the third email so for that is attempting
the debate the merits of one over the other.  Spending time arguing that
point is a waste of time.  If working on RF is something that interests
you, then show your support and say so.

Scott