From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 24 0:28:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 542) id 4C02637BBE7; Wed, 24 May 2000 00:28:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 00:28:50 -0700 From: "Andrey A. Chernov" To: Peter Wemm Cc: Bruce Evans , current@FreeBSD.ORG, jdp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/ncurses/include curses.h.in src/contrib/ncurses/ncurses/trace lib_trace.c Message-ID: <20000524002849.B45062@freebsd.org> References: <20000524064656.9760B1CE3@overcee.netplex.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i In-Reply-To: <20000524064656.9760B1CE3@overcee.netplex.com.au>; from peter@netplex.com.au on Tue, May 23, 2000 at 11:46:56PM -0700 Organization: Biomechanoid Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 11:46:56PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote: > This is by design. The symbol search order for dynamic linking is very > clearly defined, and you *can* have lots of duplicate symbols. IMHO in 99% cases people don't mean to link duplicate symbols but mean to link the same way as in static linking. What about adding special ld flag to allow duplicate linking and change default case the same way as static linking does? -- Andrey A. Chernov http://nagual.pp.ru/~ache/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message