Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:03:17 +0000 From: "Doug Barton" <dougb@dougbarton.us> To: bapt@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "Bernard Spil" <brnrd@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: mariadb10* ports broken on 9.x since last commit Message-ID: <02d2d44ad94044360e05d780ef3c1641@dougbarton.us> In-Reply-To: <beff43a0d0b5c8808e5b5760051a1320@imap.brnrd.eu> References: <beff43a0d0b5c8808e5b5760051a1320@imap.brnrd.eu> <18b931f3-2b78-0fdf-c9ba-ba3c107a4f65@dougbarton.us>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
August 31, 2016 12:37 AM, "Bernard Spil" <brnrd@freebsd.org> wrote:=0A> O= n 2016-08-30 17:45, Doug Barton wrote:=0A> =0A>> Since the last commit to= the mariadb10* ports the resulting binaries=0A>> dump core on 9.3-RELEAS= E-p43, even for a simple --help option. I am=0A>> assuming that is not th= e intended result ....=0A>> Doug=0A> =0A> Hi Doug,=0A> =0A> Nope, that is= not intended. Assume this is the 10.0.27 update? I did build them on 9.3= but have not=0A> checked the resulting binaries... Will need some time t= o investigate!=0A> =0A> https://brnrd.eu/poudriere/build.html?mastername= =3D93amd64-svn&build=3D2016-08-29_20h14m28s=0A=0AThanks Bernard. =0A=0AIt= turns out that the actual problem was binutils. I backed up several revi= sions of mariadb, past the previous working version, and had the same sym= ptoms. Then I started on the deps that had changed at the same time, and = fortunately I guessed right on the first one. =0A=0ABacking up to -r{2016= -08-25} on binutils got mariadb working with the latest version. =0A=0ADo= ug
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?02d2d44ad94044360e05d780ef3c1641>