Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 08:48:17 -0700 (MST) From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: maslanbsd@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: organization Message-ID: <20050329.084817.41630990.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <319cceca05032907411014a218@mail.gmail.com> References: <319cceca05032811484cb1a95b@mail.gmail.com> <42487982.30909@freebsdbrasil.com.br> <319cceca05032907411014a218@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: mohamed aslan <maslanbsd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: organization Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 07:41:25 -0800 > guys this is not a flame war > but the linux way in arranging the source file is really better than > freebsd way, it's a fact. > however it's easy to rearrange it in 1 min as someone said before. > but i mean this step should be done from the core team. > for example all fs has to go in a subdir called fs > arch specific file should go in subdir called arch/(arch name) > and so on . The problem is getting consensus on what is to be done. Sure, one can arbitrarily say this goes here or that goes there, but everyone's notion of reorg is a little different. It would take a lot of time and energy to get this consensus, which is better spent making things work better... Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050329.084817.41630990.imp>