From owner-freebsd-security  Mon Jul 30  9:56:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
Received: from icmp.dhs.org (e-135-33-res1.mts.net [206.45.135.33])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB8A37B403
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:56:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from modulus@rcmp.ca)
Received: from localhost (modulus@localhost)
	by icmp.dhs.org (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f6UGuKV18817
	for <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:56:21 -0500 (CDT)
	(envelope-from modulus@rcmp.ca)
X-Authentication-Warning: icmp.dhs.org: modulus owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 11:56:19 -0500 (CDT)
From: "Detective S.R. Ross Computer Crime division" <modulus@rcmp.ca>
X-X-Sender:  <modulus@icmp.dhs.org>
To: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: IPFW & natd vs ipfilter & ipnat
Message-ID: <20010730115455.D18246-100000@icmp.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-security.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-security>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-security>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


I was wondering if there have ever been any benchmarking done for
the the performance differences between IPFW & IPF & their counter parts.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message