From owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr 17 02:52:23 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-threads@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EC8D937B401; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freebsd.org.ru (www.freebsd.org.ru [194.84.67.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0AD5043FB1; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 02:52:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru)
Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2336793; Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:52:21 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:52:21 +0400
From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org.ru>
To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Message-ID: <20030417095221.GC67305@freebsd.org.ru>
References: <20030417082412.GA67305@freebsd.org.ru>
	<Pine.GSO.4.10.10304170525270.5432-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10304170525270.5432-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: deischen@freebsd.org
cc: jeff@freebsd.org
cc: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
cc: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Subject: 
	Re: FWD: Re: May I add pthread_[gs]etconcurrency to the threads libr
X-BeenThere: freebsd-threads@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: osa@FreeBSD.org.ru
List-Id: Threading on FreeBSD <freebsd-threads.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-threads>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-threads@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-threads>,
	<mailto:freebsd-threads-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:52:24 -0000

On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 05:46:07AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 09:44:09AM -0700, John Polstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > FYI -- Dan Eischen asked me not to commit your changes to
> > > libpthread.  I then told him he should at least try to use your man
> > > page and credit you appropriately.
> > > 
> > > I also told him that he's wrong about returning ENOTSUP, according
> > > to the standards.
> > 
> > So, I can't understand Daniel's position.
> 
> Because usually POSIX functions are either fully implemented or not
> implemented at all.  I took a look at the POSIX spec and this is not
> the case with pthread_[gs]setconcurrency; they do match what you
> say.
> 
> > AFAIK at this time real implementation of that fuctions not yet avaliable.
> > If it not yet avaliable - I think we must use this implementation.
> > In near future, when the other implementations to be avaliable,
> > somebody immediatly replace old fake implementation with new real one.
> 
> You missed my response that said I am implementing them "for real"
> (not fake) and that I had a slew of other changes.  I am a day or
> so away from commiting my changes (this is for libpthread, not
> libc_r or libthr).

Thanks, i see. So, what about other (not libpthread) implementations
of threads (like libc_r and libthr)?

-- 

Rgdz,                        /"\  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Sergey Osokin aka oZZ,       \ /    AGAINST HTML MAIL
http://ozz.pp.ru/             X          AND NEWS
                             / \