From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Mar 26 02:30:33 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA09379 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 02:30:33 -0800 Received: from expo.x.org (expo.x.org [198.112.45.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA09366 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 02:30:25 -0800 Received: from fedora.x.org by expo.x.org id AA28608; Sun, 26 Mar 95 05:29:46 -0500 Received: by fedora.x.org id AA04579; Sun, 26 Mar 1995 05:29:45 -0500 Message-Id: <9503261029.AA04579@fedora.x.org> To: hackers@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: httpd as part of the system. In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 26 Mar 1995 01:28:11 MST. <199503260828.BAA25352@clem.systemsix.com> Organization: X Consortium Date: Sun, 26 Mar 1995 05:29:44 EST From: "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > several people requested a copy of mosaic-2.5 for -current: > > freefall.cdrom.com:/incoming/mosaic-2.5.tgz > > this is stock mosaic 2.5 statically linked to motif 1.2, compiled > on 2.0-950322-SNAP. > I don't normally intrude into other people's legal affairs, but you're in violation of the Motif 1.2 source license, unless you're collecting Motif run-time royalties and sending them to OSF. NCSA Mosaic binaries are statically linked with Motif 1.1, because the 1.1 source license is less restrictive than the 1.2 source license. I don't know what the realities are, whether the OSF would really sue you if they found out, you'll have to decide for yourself whether or not you're worried about it. :-) -- Kaleb