From owner-freebsd-net Fri Sep 1 12:39:40 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4298E37B505 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:39:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from smap@localhost) by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id e81Jcnn23793; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:38:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bubba.whistle.com( 207.76.205.7) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0) id xma023790; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:38:40 -0700 Received: (from archie@localhost) by bubba.whistle.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA86592; Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:38:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from archie) From: Archie Cobbs Message-Id: <200009011938.MAA86592@bubba.whistle.com> Subject: Re: Proposal to clarify mbuf handling rules In-Reply-To: <200009010907.aa78923@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> "from David Malone at Sep 1, 2000 09:07:19 am" To: David Malone Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2000 12:38:34 -0700 (PDT) Cc: Bosko Milekic , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL82 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Malone writes: > Great! Maybe Archie should say which he thinks we opt for in the beginning, > and we can see if we can get some patches reviewed. I like what you guys have agreed upon and my only comment is to "do it with macros" so we can change things around later but that should be obvious already. Unfortunately I'll be out of email contact next week but look forward to seeing where things stand upon returning. Cheers, -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message